Why Solution Fit Comes Before Vendor Choice
A public website, Shopify store, SaaS app, document library, and lawsuit-response matter can all need accessibility help, but they rarely need the same mix of software, expert review, remediation, evidence, and maintenance.
A useful buying process starts by naming the pressure: legal, procurement, ecommerce revenue, customer support, agency portfolio, or routine governance. That pressure changes the proof, timeline, and provider questions.
The assessment on this page is a routing aid. It does not certify compliance, give legal advice, or prove that any single product category solves the whole problem.
What The Assessment Looks For
It asks about urgency, site type, platform, critical paths, internal implementation capacity, document or media scope, and the kind of support you think you need.
It then turns that context into a plain-English recommendation with likely categories and cautions. The categories may include public-page triage, expert audit, developer workflow, monitoring, accessWidget-style support, accessFlow-style remediation workflow, accessServices-style managed support, VPAT/ACR support, user testing, file/PDF accessibility, and select-plan litigation-support resources.
If the result is useful, you can attach it to a public-page snapshot request. Partner sharing remains optional and requires a separate consent checkbox.
How To Use The Result
Use the generated fit summary to brief your developer, agency, counsel, procurement team, or accessibility provider. It gives everyone the same starting context.
Run the public-page snapshot after the fit assessment so the conversation has both buyer context and visible evidence from the submitted URL.
For demand letters, NOS 446 matters, or lawsuits, keep legal strategy with qualified counsel and use the result only to organize the technical accessibility workstream.
Where accessiBe May Fit
When appropriate and with your consent, we may refer you to accessiBe, whose public offerings include accessWidget, accessFlow, accessServices, VPAT/ACR support, expert audit, user testing, file/PDF accessibility, and select-plan litigation support resources.
That disclosure does not mean every visitor should choose the same package. Use the assessment to decide whether the conversation should focus on software support, remediation workflow, expert services, procurement evidence, file accessibility, or litigation-support resources.
Decision path
Use these links to move from research to evidence, then from evidence to a responsible remediation option.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use the solution fit assessment without submitting contact details?
Yes. The assessment runs in your browser and shows the recommendation on the page. Submitting a URL and work email is optional and only needed if you want to attach the result to a public-page snapshot and follow-up.
Does the assessment choose a vendor for me?
No. It maps your situation to likely solution categories and questions to ask. It is not a legal opinion, quote, certification, or vendor guarantee.
Why does the page mention accessiBe?
This site may refer consenting visitors to accessiBe when the fit appears relevant. The relationship is disclosed, partner sharing is optional, and the assessment still explains limits and alternatives.